Durham Bell

My feedback

  1. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Premiere Pro » Stability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    I know this is a stale thread, but I ran into this when I had rotated some video, nested it, then applied WS to the nest. So, basically, WS thought it was operating on W x L and it was actually affecting L x W (the clip was rotated 90 degrees, then scaled to fill the frame). Took me a while to figure out what I had done.

  2. 4 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Premiere Pro » Effects & Transitions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    This isn't isolated to a flip. Lots of effects will cause problems if they are above WS in the chain. Even the ones that shouldn't. For example: add a video Equalize above it and you'll get this weird kind of ghosting thing that happens (presumably it's sending part of it's output to the WS and part of it is bypassing it). It produces kind of a double image, or at least it does on every video I've inadvertently done it on.

    Even weirder stuff happens if you use a fixed effect, nest it, then stabilize the nest. I was boggled about this one video that was producing a weird "letterbox" when there shouldn't have been any there. Turns out I had rotated a video 90 degrees, nested that, then applied some other effects and then nested that and applied WS over top of it all. That nesting or time, but not both has bitten me more than once.

  3. 197 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  After Effects » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    There isn't even a dedicated site for After Effects vs Premier Pro, it's adobe-video.UV.com. I totally agree with you about this but they're not going to do this before **** freezes over and pigs fly.

    Your assertion that "...it could make the shareholders happy..." isn't even true so far as I have seen. They really just do whatever they want whenever they feel like it. I don't think Adobe even understands the concept of quality assurance. They have been riding the fact that they cornered a market for about 10 years now, and don't seem to have any intention of actually putting effort in anytime soon. Well, except to make crapware like Premier Rush...

    They could take a **** on their shareholders' kitchen table and their stock wouldn't lose much value. There are SERIOUS bugs that have persisted in some of the apps for over 6 years that likely will never be addressed. 🤷‍♂️ Oh, but they're making a "Customer happiness" (or whatever they call it) push right now, so they will fix a few things with Adobe Spark and maybe EC (because that costs dump trucks full of corporate money).

    Just saying: don't hold your breath.

  4. 5 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  Premiere Pro » Effects & Transitions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    But then I wouldn't get to hear Premier Pro scolding me for it's own issues. 🥺

    🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    BTW, why in DOG's name does this only have 5 votes?!?!?

    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  5. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Premiere Pro » Editing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  6. 55 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Premiere Pro » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    What about just passing the render job to Media Encoder? That's basically what we're talking about, no? It's a great idea!

    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  7. 19 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    7 comments  ·  Premiere Pro » Stability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  8. 159 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    17 comments  ·  Premiere Pro » Audio  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  9. 58 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    5 comments  ·  Media Encoder » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    This is one of those "I can't believe it doesn't already do this" things.

    Sort of like remuxing audio streams:
    https://adobe-video.uservoice.com/forums/911308-media-encoder/suggestions/39952327-basic-audio-remuxing-capability

    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  10. 3 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  Media Encoder » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell shared this idea  · 
  11. 6 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Media Encoder  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  12. 9 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Media Encoder » Batch Processing  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  13. 7 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  Media Encoder » Preference & Settings  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  14. 10 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    9 comments  ·  Premiere Pro » Effects & Transitions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    Voting for this because I seem to be having a similar issue. In my case it happens when I save a project with analysis, then open it back up and the analysis is gone. Oddly enough the clip still stays stabilized, but I can't change any of the parameters (like the framing etc) because they are grayed out. It also seems that the issue is not limited to Premier and also affects After Effects as well.

    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
  15. 2 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Ideally, what additional categories would you like to see?
    We review across all categories; poor categorical fit doesn’t keep an idea from getting our attention, though I’d agree, that could make such ideas harder to find and vote for.

    Durham Bell shared this idea  · 
  16. 1 vote
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    6 comments  ·  Audition » Workflow & Interoperability  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    Are you certain that you have Dropbox syncing properly? OneDrive will now allow you to have "online" and "offline" files, the former being only accessible on demand (requiring internet connectivity). When the files are "online only" (again, with OneDrive) the computer downloads them when they are needed and then deletes the file again after utilizing the data, otherwise it is basically just a pointer to a file. My immediate suspicion is that this is a DropBox problem and not an Audition problem (and believe me, I'd pin it on Adobe in a heartbeat).

  17. 10 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    4 comments  ·  Audition » Multitrack Editor  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Durham Bell supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Durham Bell commented  · 

    This is actually a really common feature in other DAWs. I started out on Acid Pro (actually while it was in public beta...Sonic Foundry...memories...) it let you put tracks in folders, so you could fold and unfold them (as you can with code in IDEs), which was invaluable when working on a big mix. This is one of those areas where I feel like Audition was made for people to produce podcasts or voiceovers, and not serious "from the ground up" production and composition. Evidence for this include the 5 votes this feature suggestion has. That's just crazy...unless there is another suggestion elsewhere in the uservoice.

    It's really a shame, since Audition has some really unique features that would probably lead some people to it from other DAWs but for the fact that it misses some glaring workflow improvements like this. Seriously...5 votes in 1.5 years? Audition is the only multitrack DAW I can think of that doesn't do this.

Feedback and Knowledge Base