the dudes
My feedback
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment the dudes
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
347 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment the dudes
commented
AFAIK its even open source...
the dudes
supported this idea
·
-
987 votesUnder Review ·
AdminVictoria Nece
(Sr. Product Manager, Motion Graphics and VFX, Adobe DVA)
responded
Hello everybody!
(This post was co-authored by Tim Kurkoski (After Effects Product Owner), Andrew Cheyne (After Effects Engineering Manager), and Victoria Nece (After Effects Product Manager).)
This thread has been sitting here for quite a while without a response. To start, we want to apologize for that. We haven’t been ignoring you or your feedback – this is just a particularly complex topic. That said, it’s time for us to check in with you, clarify a few things, and give you an idea of what we’re looking at for the future of After Effects, especially when it comes to performance.
To start, we fully understand that you want After Effects to be as fast as it can be – utilizing your computer’s hardware resources to render as fast as possible. Over the last several years, we have been working on the performance of After Effects constantly. Sometimes those performance gains…
An error occurred while saving the comment the dudes
commented
@Christopher Jeffries: By 2020, you should know that more cores almost always equals to less AE-performance. It's just very barren to think that a Threadripper would do you good there. It never worked that way.
An error occurred while saving the comment the dudes
commented
@Victoria Neece: It's been exactly 1 year. Time for an update 💁♂️
the dudes
supported this idea
·
-
340 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment the dudes
commented
This equals to an UPGRADE of the heavily deprecated "Set Matte" Effect. It WOULD be the solution if it was any USABLE 😡
-
3 votesthe dudes
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
81 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
32 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
114 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
121 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
197 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
22 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment the dudes
commented
Did you know this is an open standard?
the dudes
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesthe dudes
supported this idea
·
-
439 votes
Currently, Premiere uses the Lanczos method for intrinsic scale and rotation. Lanczos is an exceptionally high-quality interpolation method which generally yields better results than bicubic, bilinear or nearest neighbor. From reading the forum post, it seems that up-scaling is the real issue here. I suggest looking at the Detail-Preserving Upscale effect in After Effects. It does a really good job and gives you some parameters to tweak to fit your specific content.
the dudes
supported this idea
·
-
434 votes
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I am moving this to Under Review.
the dudes
supported this idea
·
-
112 votes
Moving this to Under Review. Thanks again for all the feedback.
the dudes
supported this idea
·
This is terrible. Base functionality not there :(