Solomon Nero

My feedback

  1. 13 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  After Effects » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Solomon Nero supported this idea  · 
  2. 285 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    20 comments  ·  After Effects  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Solomon Nero supported this idea  · 
  3. 340 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    31 comments  ·  After Effects » Compositing & effects  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Solomon Nero supported this idea  · 
  4. 987 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    439 comments  ·  After Effects » Performance  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hello everybody!

    (This post was co-authored by Tim Kurkoski (After Effects Product Owner), Andrew Cheyne (After Effects Engineering Manager), and Victoria Nece (After Effects Product Manager).)

    This thread has been sitting here for quite a while without a response. To start, we want to apologize for that. We haven’t been ignoring you or your feedback – this is just a particularly complex topic. That said, it’s time for us to check in with you, clarify a few things, and give you an idea of what we’re looking at for the future of After Effects, especially when it comes to performance.

    To start, we fully understand that you want After Effects to be as fast as it can be – utilizing your computer’s hardware resources to render as fast as possible. Over the last several years, we have been working on the performance of After Effects constantly. Sometimes those performance gains…

    Solomon Nero supported this idea  · 
  5. 1,539 votes
    Sign in Sign in with Adobe ID
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    561 comments  ·  Premiere Pro » Formats  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Thanks for all the feedback. It’s pretty clear that we’ve got to look into the workflow using this format more closely, there are enough reports about gaps at this point to reopen this item. I’ll post more info about next steps shortly. In the meantime, a couple of questions are easy to answer:

    - The plugin is designed for Premiere Pro. It currently doesn’t provide support for After Effects.
    - It does work with AME, so if you want to use it for batch processing, that’s very doable
    - If you’ve started a project with Autokroma, there’s no easy way to transfer it to be running with the new plugin.

    Patrick

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Solomon Nero commented  · 

    I have been a supporter of adobe since the cs2 suite...and dabbled in it before that. I remember when RED was working on the Epic, adobe released a beta plugin so people beta testing the camera could edit in premiere, when apple and avid refused to release functionality for RED in final cut and avid....It was this kind of forward vision that convinced me to switch every studio I consulted with from final cut 7 to premiere.
    I now look at this situation with blackmagic raw and how long we have waited for support in AE and premiere, and I feel like that go-getter attitude that I saw in adobe that excited me, is gone.

    My confidence is shaken in adobe, many are switching to resolve to edit, and I dont want to, but I am not seeing much of an option...

    Please change my mind...

    Solomon Nero supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base