Boris
My feedback
-
84 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
113 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
462 votes
Definitely a great time saver!
Thanks for creating a mockup and for the productive conversation in the comments, we’re going to take a closer look at implementation details next.Cheers,
PatrickBoris
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
47 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Boris
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
93 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
10 votes
Is it possible to provide us with your finished edits and original audio for us to compare what’s automatic versus your edited (desired) output? This will help us train the software.
An error occurred while saving the comment Boris
commented
Yes! It seems like there should be a way to "Sensei" this particular problem.
It would be great to have an opt in in the settings of the program itself to "Send anonymous data" to Adobe with the audio file and the corrected visemes. (It should already know how the software calculated it.)
..but I can see that taking a bunch of programming resources.
Howabout a request to everyone (like hundreds or thousands) to send in their files (like you have requested here). Feed those 1000's of files to the Sensei and see what happens.
(...I am assuming at some point Sensei will become self aware and use its new viseme powers to more closely emulate a human and end us all - but in the meantime it would save me some time fixing lip sync. Thanks!)
Boris
supported this idea
·
-
12 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
225 votes
Hi Florian,
while this is a rather critical and large change to the way the application works and will take some time to be implemented, we’ll definitely put this under consideration.
There’s more than one solution to this problem, though.
A good short term opportunity is to use the parallel install feature in the creative cloud application. It should help to at least take away some of the issues working with people on a different version of the application.
Another thing worth keeping in mind is that you can install CC on two different machines (if you’re on an individual subscription). That gives you additional opportunity to keep different versions around for compatibility reasons.
I’ll update the status of this request as we move along.
If you have further thoughts on this matter, please keep them coming.
Thanks
PatrickBoris
supported this idea
·
-
55 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
585 votes
Thanks for the suggestion(s).
Boris
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesBoris
supported this idea
·
I would use this all the time!
But even if I had no use for it, I would vote for this based on the excellent (and illustrated) explanation from the OP!