Anonymous
My feedback
-
175 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
311 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
929 votesUnder Review ·
AdminVictoria Nece
(Sr. Product Manager, Motion Graphics and VFX, Adobe DVA)
responded
Hello everybody!
(This post was co-authored by Tim Kurkoski (After Effects Product Owner), Andrew Cheyne (After Effects Engineering Manager), and Victoria Nece (After Effects Product Manager).)
This thread has been sitting here for quite a while without a response. To start, we want to apologize for that. We haven’t been ignoring you or your feedback – this is just a particularly complex topic. That said, it’s time for us to check in with you, clarify a few things, and give you an idea of what we’re looking at for the future of After Effects, especially when it comes to performance.
To start, we fully understand that you want After Effects to be as fast as it can be – utilizing your computer’s hardware resources to render as fast as possible. Over the last several years, we have been working on the performance of After Effects constantly. Sometimes those performance gains…
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Considering the 2020 release was COMPLETELY glossed over and not mentioned at Adobe Max, it does not seem there is anything worth talking about in this release :(
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Perhaps it's just me, but using an iMac pro 10 core, 64GB RAM, 16GB Vega, MacOS 10.14.6, I see minimal, if any, improvement in render times with After Effects 2020 that was just released. Render times in both the timeline (RAM preview), as well as render queue, are nearly unchanged from the 2019 release. The release notes are fairly vague, where exactly are the improvements???
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Barry and Kevin, no doubt you'll work on adding Blur, but if you could make it a Gaussian Blur, that would be most excellent. Clients love it.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Keep 'em coming guys! Adobe isn't reading this thread!!
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
How does Apple Motion compare? I've never tried it out. Viable alternative?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This seems like as good of a place as any to list alternatives to After Effects because clearly, Adobe isn't reading this thread. I'll start with Nuke. Any other's want to chime in?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Any comments here Adobe???
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Just gonna leave this here again.... https://adobe-video.uservoice.com/forums/911308-media-encoder/suggestions/33852205-actually-listen-and-implement-the-ideas-here
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Specific, tangible feedback, here it is: When rendering from After Effects, automatically spawn instances of AErender.exe in the background that will utilize the as many cores as are available to render.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Adobe are you going to give us a response?? How many comments saying the same things do we need to post???
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Has Adobe ever given a response to this? There are several threads just stating that 'multi-threading isn't returning in the same for as it was in CC2014'. That was several years ago.
Adobe staff, we know you read these comments. Can you acknowledge this is something ALL of your users can really benefit from? Are you hearing us?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
This has been known for quite some time... https://forums.adobe.com/message/8584330#8584330 . Adobe are you going to give an update of your findings of a 'better solution'? There are several 3rd party apps that have been able to find a solution...
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Nice! Now Abobe, why haven't you built this natively into the program? Why must we struggle to shout at you that we desperately need After Effects to consistently actually utilize the power of our machines?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
While they are indeed 2 different programs with different ways of working and reasons to use, there is indeed overlap with After Effects and Blackmagic Fusion. To a degree, some in the industry are shifting to Fusion in part because of this very reason, true multi-threaded utilization, for the same work processes between the two programs.
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
196 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
230 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
532 votes
This is something we are looking into. Thanks for the feedback.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,378 votes
Hi everyone,
as of last night, ProRes RAW is available via the Public Beta program. More info on how it works is available from
https://theblog.adobe.com/introducing-public-beta/
If you wanna learn more about which Adobe products are supported, system requirements and then some, please head over to
https://community.adobe.com/t5/premiere-pro-beta/discuss-prores-raw-support/td-p/11013854?page=1
Note: we’re still ramping up Public Beta, if you don’t see it yet in your region / using your Adobe ID, please either contact me directly (https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-j-palmer-b9230a1/) or give this a little more time to show up in your Creative Cloud Desktop Application.
Cheers,
PatrickAn error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Adobe, this thread is basically on fire.... no update here?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
How is the 'looking into it' going, Adobe?
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
Is there an ETA with this? Almost needs to be a hotfix release as this codec is already being used in production.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
@Joe Keck, what camera are you using?
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesAnonymous
shared this idea
·
-
34 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
176 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
267 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
24 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
72 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
20 votes1 comment · Cross-Application Workflows » User experience/interface · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
416 votes
As Wes noted, we are looking at many areas for optimization and have made strides in the last few releases already.
We recognize there are still many areas to improve performance and we are investing in appropriate areas.
Threads that are catch-alls are often non-actionable. Please keep giving us specific feedback on what workflows are slow for you.
Technical solutions may not always be as obvious as some people may be suggesting as the application architecture is often very different than people’s conception.
Short answer. Yes, we want to and will make it faster.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
43 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
11 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
105 votes
We’re actively looking into expanding Audition’s session format to include project-style features such as bins. Please consider sharing additional requests from project-based applications.
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous
commented
@John, it's hard to fathom this was ever left out. It's quite an oversight in my, and many others, opinion.
Anonymous
shared this idea
·
hahhaha great meme!