Joergen Geerds
My feedback
-
66 votesJoergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
215 votesJoergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
15 votesJoergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
154 votesJoergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
113 votesJoergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
201 votesJoergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
297 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Joergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJoergen Geerds
shared this idea
·
-
241 votesIn Progress ·
AdminFergus Hammond
(Product Manager, Video & Audio Cloud Workflows, Adobe DVA)
responded
Hi all,
The I-frame first idea is implemented in multiple codecs, including anything that is LongGOP in an MXF wrapper, XDCAM in a MOV wrapper, and it's being added for the work that will be released soon that will hardware accelerate AVC Intra on Apple silicon in MXF.
Regards,
Fergus
Joergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesJoergen Geerds
supported this idea
·
Looking back at the PS beta program I had participated a decade ago, there was an immediate and active and healthy forum dialog between the project managers, (adobe) scientists and developers directly with the beta users, and some extremely useful features came out of that, and bugs were squished based on severity, but usually in the next release.
the user voice, the adobe forum and every other public facing adobe communication tool appears to be totally neglected and ignored by adobe, and it feels like we are just posting stuff here that will never be seen by anybody at adobe, since we are not even getting acknowledgements.
Adobe: if you happen to see this, you have a user-interaction problem here. The PM team should communicate with the users that go through the trouble talking about the bugs and issues more clearly and often.