Jef Herrmann
My feedback
12 results found
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesJef Herrmann
shared this idea
·
-
6 votesJef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
commented
I managed to create lighter weight films out of After Effect and they are 16 fps, not 15. Then I found another problem, which is that you cannot use Proxy with the stabilisation (wharp stabilizer) effect, and evidently those 8 mm films need stabilisation, so Premiere is somewhat hopeless with that type of work. What a pity.
Jef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
commented
Same issue. With an original at 16 fps or 18 fps, ME creates proxy at 15 fps and the proxy are not synchronised with the original. The only known way to create a proxy at the correct frame rate is to transcode with Da Vinci to obtain a proxy at the correct frame rate but then we can't switch from proxy to original during editing but only at the end by re-linking the original clips. I do not understand why when I ask Premiere to do a proxy as per the original ME changes the frame rate from 16 or 18 to down to 15.fps. That is not fair.
-
64 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
commented
I tested the method of building the proxy with After Effect, and then use it with Premiere as recommended by one of this community members. That did help as I was stuck but evidently it disturbed my workflow significantly, and the 2022 version of Premiere still did not address the issue, what a pity! It seems to be so simple to fix, just respect the fps of the original instead of changing it to 15 fps. Who is using 15 fps anyway?
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
commented
Same request for the proxies
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
commented
With an original at 16 fps or 18 fps, AME creates proxy at 15 fps and the proxy are not synchronised with the original. The only known way to create a proxy at the correct frame rate is to transcode with Da Vinci to obtain a proxy at the correct frame rate but then we can't switch from proxy to original during editing but only at the end by re-linking the original clips. I do not understand why when I ask Premiere to do a proxy as per the original AME changes the frame rate from 16 or 18 to down to 15.fps.
Jef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
680 votesJef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
707 votesIn Progress ·
AdminFergus Hammond
(Product Manager, Video & Audio Cloud Workflows, Adobe DVA)
responded
Hi all,
Background auto save is now in beta. For more information, please see this post our support forum. If you've got feedback on the feature, please provide it via the comments section of the post.
Thanks!
Fergus
Jef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
6 votesJef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
37 votesJef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
commented
With an original at 16 fps or 18 fps, AME creates proxy at 15 fps and the proxy are not synchronised with the original. The only known way to create a proxy at the correct frame rate is to transcode with Da Vinci to obtain a proxy at the correct frame rate but then we can't switch from proxy to original during editing but only at the end by re-linking the original clips. I do not understand why when I ask Premiere to do a proxy as per the original AME changes the frame rate from 16 or 18 to down to 15.fps. That is not fair.
Jef Herrmann
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Jef Herrmann
commented
As far as I know, Premiere is always using the original to export, even if the toggle is on proxy.
Premiere export screen has just been updated and still no improvement over the flexibility to setup the frame rate in export or proxy. Are you listening at all to the users demands? Do you suggest we use an expensive plugin developped by someone else or are you suggesting we switch to your competitors to handle 8 mm films?