UCKG All
My feedback
-
1 voteUCKG All
shared this idea
·
-
1 voteUCKG All
shared this idea
·
-
5 votesUCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
262 votes
Thanks for all the feedback so far.
It is one of many areas we are looking into.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
277 votes
Thanks for your input on how to improve the browser and the details on how you are organizing your Motion Graphics templates.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
293 votes
Thank you for your feedback. This is under review.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
378 votesUCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
358 votesUCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
376 votesUCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
452 votes
Currently, Premiere uses the Lanczos method for intrinsic scale and rotation. Lanczos is an exceptionally high-quality interpolation method which generally yields better results than bicubic, bilinear or nearest neighbor. From reading the forum post, it seems that up-scaling is the real issue here. I suggest looking at the Detail-Preserving Upscale effect in After Effects. It does a really good job and gives you some parameters to tweak to fit your specific content.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
456 votes
Thanks everyone for your feedback. I am moving this to Under Review.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
1,553 votes
Thanks for all the feedback. It’s pretty clear that we’ve got to look into the workflow using this format more closely, there are enough reports about gaps at this point to reopen this item. I’ll post more info about next steps shortly. In the meantime, a couple of questions are easy to answer:
- The plugin is designed for Premiere Pro. It currently doesn’t provide support for After Effects.
- It does work with AME, so if you want to use it for batch processing, that’s very doable
- If you’ve started a project with Autokroma, there’s no easy way to transfer it to be running with the new plugin.Patrick
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
609 votes
This is a great request that is certainly something we want to implement. Rest assured our engineers DO understand the importance of this feature and how to get the job done. We also know that the performance and stability of the app should be our #1 priority and that is where our focus is right now.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
597 votes
This is something we are looking into. Thanks for the feedback.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
462 votes
Definitely a great time saver!
Thanks for creating a mockup and for the productive conversation in the comments, we’re going to take a closer look at implementation details next.Cheers,
PatrickUCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
492 votes
As Wes noted, we are looking at many areas for optimization and have made strides in the last few releases already.
We recognize there are still many areas to improve performance and we are investing in appropriate areas.
Threads that are catch-alls are often non-actionable. Please keep giving us specific feedback on what workflows are slow for you.
Technical solutions may not always be as obvious as some people may be suggesting as the application architecture is often very different than people’s conception.
Short answer. Yes, we want to and will make it faster.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
506 votes
As Jim Simon noted, there is already a request for this so certainly upvote that request.
This is an area we are looking into for future versions to make auto-save more reliable and out of the way.
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
564 votesUCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
585 votes
Thanks for the suggestion(s).
UCKG All
supported this idea
·
-
552 votesUnder Review · 52 comments · Premiere Pro » Effects & Transitions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →UCKG All
supported this idea
·
![Screen-Shot-2018-11-22-at-6.15.57-PM[1].png 80 KB](/assets/217242535/Screen-Shot-2018-11-22-at-6.15.57-PM%5B1%5D.png){kind=link}
