TB54
My feedback
-
200 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment TB54
commented
@Justin VanAlstyne I'm not sure to understand: "interpret footage" is the only way I see to modify the framerate of a clip without creating or calculating new frames - it's perfectly clean (to go from a 25ps footage to a 24fps one, for instance). Slowing down with speed/duration will create those inter-frames, whatever the chosen way.
TB54
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment TB54
commented
This is turning me mad and making me very late for my edit right now - and even if you can match the framerate threw the Media Encoder trick, audio won't follow, so it's still useless.
That's exhausting and making edit of projects full of archive nearly impossible, please fix this.
EDIT: for those who have this problem but must use proxies anyway, here is a (pain-in-the...) solution: create your proxies manually. That means:
1) Go in Media encoder, import your video files, and create "proxies" by converting them into a lame codec (like ProRes Proxy for instance), while keeping the SAME RESOLUTION and audio tracks distribution (2.0 / 5.1) than the original files (very important).
2) Put the converted files in another folder.
3) Then, in your project, relink all your files to those proxies. At the end, when you must export, relink your elements to your original video files. Complicated, but it works, and allows you to interpret footage as you want. -
16 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TB54
commented
That would also help me a lot, I loose a lot of time selecting them one by one.
TB54
supported this idea
·
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TB54
commented
I came here to ask that. Markers, specially the ones on a long period (from TC X to TC Y) would be a great tool to clarify an edit (to see quicly where on the timeline is the main edit, where is the alternatives, etc.)... only if there was an option to move those markers with the timeline as it changes. I use the Track Select Forward a lot, and it makes timeline markers unusable.
TB54
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesTB54
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesTB54
shared this idea
·
-
31 votesTB54
supported this idea
·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment TB54
commented
Same problem here.
In the wait of a bug fix, a temporary solution is to put the shot alone in a sequence #2 which has the same settings of the sequence #1 in which you edit, then to drag-drop this sequence #2 into your sequence #1 (like you would import a shot - it will appear green) : the effects you put on this sequence-shot won't change its ratio anymore.
TB54
supported this idea
·
-
120 votesTB54
supported this idea
·
-
84 votes
Hi Andrew,
your comments are as thoughtful as they are timely.
While I usually would have to close this item as it isn’t specific enough, I’m gonna leave it open so others can see this and add comments:Please come back and vote for exactly the items that you feel need a V2, some polish, or just remove friction in areas that have grown over time. Add a new request if what you’d like to see revised isn’t discussed yet.
We’re already seeing good patterns on User Voice as to which items and areas would be good candidates for upcoming releases. You can see some of the top runners already marked as “Under Review”. And while that won’t tell you with which release exactly we’ll have things ready for you, it’s an indicator of an investment we’re making to improve features and workflows where most users express their needs.
Cheers,…
TB54
supported this idea
·
-
133 votesTB54
supported this idea
·
-
3 votesTB54
supported this idea
·
-
532 votes
As Wes noted, we are looking at many areas for optimization and have made strides in the last few releases already.
We recognize there are still many areas to improve performance and we are investing in appropriate areas.
Threads that are catch-alls are often non-actionable. Please keep giving us specific feedback on what workflows are slow for you.
Technical solutions may not always be as obvious as some people may be suggesting as the application architecture is often very different than people’s conception.
Short answer. Yes, we want to and will make it faster.
TB54
supported this idea
·
-
307 votes
This change is available in public beta now! See the comments from Wes Howell. Also follow the beta forum post here: https://community.adobe.com/t5/premiere-pro-beta-discussions/discuss-paste-to-same-track/td-p/12867770
TB54
supported this idea
·
-
2 votesTB54
shared this idea
·
-
160 votesTB54
supported this idea
·
-
18 votesTB54
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment TB54
commented
I second this : the menu Bar (File / Edit / Help...) in Premiere Windows is the only full white element in an all dark background, and it can be very tiring for the eye after hours of work.
@Justin Beware, "speed/duration" is really not the same thing. This process will create inter-images, by interpolation or interpretation of the footage, and give a dirtier result than the original video.
We all use interpretation footage here specifically to avoid that (for instance to edit together 24 fps and 25 fps clips on the same timeline, as it's usual with archives, while keeping the video quality clean and not creating any inter-frame).