I think it would be awesome to have a better structure for LUTs. I wish it were more organized with the option of having folders. Lightroom has something similar to where you can have folders holding presets, but when I want to use a LUT in Premiere Pro, I have to pick through the long list I have aquired, or go through the browse option and go through those folders one by one. I would like to have that organization that I use in Finder (osx) within Lumetri. I've loved some of the additions to cc2019 and think this could be a nice feature as well.

Just bought an iMac Pro to find out Premiere doesn't export correct color after grade. Massive desaturation & contrast lost after export. I've uninstalled and reinstalled, This is not the "quicktime" problem most of these complaints are chalked up to, and it is not a "mac" problem most write it off as. My previous iMac this was not an issue, now it has become a work stopping problem that has me wondering if i should throw in the towel and switch to Final Cut. Do you plan to fix this problem with an update soon? (late 2017 iMac Pro base model, Latest updated Premiere pro)

The past 2 iterations of PPCC have been a disaster when attempting to use Lumetri color. When scrubbing through clips with Lumetri applied, sometimes the color will shift (in the monitor) to a completely desaturated (log-like) image ... even though my original footage was not shot in log.

When scrubbing back across, sometimes the color shifts back to the proper corrected look, but other times I simply have to toggle the fx lumetri effect on/ off to get it to return to normal.

The absolute worst part of this, is that during exports, sometimes PP will manifest that same glitch by EXPORTING a clip in the washed out look. Considering some of my projects are 6-10 minutes long, and sometimes it's just an individual random clip, this is infuriating.

This technique would incorporate, in the back end / behind the hood of premiere, The Flow Chart from Encore/After Effects, Adjustment Layers (in the Expanded Lumetri panel), Masks, Tracking, and dynamically linking the "Adjustment layers" to effects in the Effects Control Panel to make adjustments in the Effects Control panel as well.

This is basiclly a way for Premiere to introduce 'Nodes' while maintaining it's current Effects Panel. The one issue I find with this is parallel nodes. I'm not sure what the stack order would look like in the Effects Control Panel. Each 'Node/Adjustment Layer' should allow for tracking of pixels, as it currently does, bezier masks with the pen tool to isolate pixels, and as I mention before the Flow of nodes should follow the stack order in the Effects control Panel.

This is valuable because currently the Effects panel is the only way of tracking multiple color adjustment on a clip/adjustment layer. With multiple Lumetri Effects on a clip the renaming and stack order of effects gets clunky and confusing. Adding this feature to Premiere will help editors intuitively follow the adjustment made to clips.

I'm using a 5k retina iMac. I'm a long time Adobe Premiere user. I'm noticing that the color in premiere program monitor looks nothing like the color of the files I export. I've read that its a problem with the 5k iMac's wide color gamut. This is not an issue in final cut pro. Will this be corrected soon? I've read about work arounds where people put a lut on the timeline to simulate the export or they have to use a second monitor with rec 709 color space as a work around.

This is a huge problem. I make my living in video production. I've been told this is an issue you are working on for an upcoming patch. Is that true?

I have the Lumetri panel always open in a group of tabs, but it's not the panel that's shown/active (usually it's the Effect Controls Panel).

Often I'll need to tweak color using Lumetri for a slight exposure boost or white balance shift, so I click the Lumetri tab, make the edit, then click back to Effect Controls tab showing on top of that panel group.

But this still leaves the Selection Follows Playhead on and I have to go disable it every time.

The best would be a preference for this behavior - whether it's auto-enabled by Lumetri's activation or not.

I work with a couple of LUTs and use a home and work computer. I have the same LUTs I need on both computers but I have more LUTs on my home computer. The problem is I will use a LUT at work and even though I have the same LUT at home when I open the project at home it applies a different LUT to the shots I have already colored. For example, lets say I have a LUT named "Color" and it is the first LUT listed in my lumetri list. When I open the project at home Lumetri will apply the LUT that is first on the list regardless if it is "Color" or not. So I have to go back in and reapply the correct LUT to each shot.

What I am suggesting is that Lumetri tries to locate the exact name and apply said LUT rather than going on position. Obviously if the same name does not exist, it should have a default.

LUT management is very challenging within Premiere. Many users try to simply place the LUTs inside the folder rather than import them via Pr which leads to instability.

Recently I reopened a job (that was finished 2 years ago) in order to create language versions and the LUTs were not in the same order as the new version of Premiere. The wrong LUT was being used in the new Pr version. I believe it is something to do with the numbering order of the LUTs (just a guess).

What we need is a reliable LUT management solution which would be driven via the CC Assets Panel. That way, by having the management handled external to Premiere, we can rely on the file structure over time and new releases of Premiere.