This has not been fixed even though Adobe has claimed to fix this.

I have the media in one master project. My assistant has a their shared project. I open a small sequence from that project and drag the media from it it into my main project. EVEN THOUGH I ALREADY HAVE ALL THE MEDIA, I STILL GET DUPLICATED MEDIA. And on top of that it creates a separate folder for each small clip of footage. Take a look at the attached screenshot.

This is horrible. Fix this asap please. What's the point of shared projects if we can't move media back and forth between them?

We take it for granted that clicking on a clip in the timeline selects ALL the tracks belonging to the clip (when "Linked Selection" is turned on). However, if you have an audio transition applied to a clip, clicking on the audio transition selects ONLY the one track on which you click. For example, if I have a clip of six linked mono audio tracks, I have to shift select the audio transition applied to each channel. Every other NLE I've used does not behave this way. It should only take ONE click to select the transition that has been applied across all the audio channels on a clip. My attached screenshot shows an example of this behaviour.

We need a professionnal way to edit a multicam sequence into a target sequence with all the audio tracks included in the multicam sequence.

If my multicam sequence have 6 audio tracks, I have to copy them from the multicam sequence and paste them into the target sequence, and cut multicam image + these "unlinked" audio channels ...

We want to keep all the audios sources for the mixer or sound editor. But these "unlinked" audios can be a big source of problems during the cutting ... Some audios clips can be desynchronisated, crushed, erased ...

And impossible to make a simple "match frame" after that, to recover the 6 audios tracks ... I have to copy TC IN and TC OUT into the timeline, cut the 6 audios clips, et drag and drop into the target timeline ... Not very productive, and so suprising for a software like Premiere to don't have an easy way to nest 6 (or less or more) tracks with a multicam image ...

Thank's

In project windows right click on media should convert it into nest.
Just like labels in sequence change it's colour to chosen label on media, all cuts in selected media will transform into nest with effects and cuts you already done in sequence.

In the nest you will have unedited video with default effects (all effects you have used are in the cuts of the nest).

Why this feature: After editing I take specific media and repleace it with AE composition because of keying. It is way easier to put in on one media in the nest which is edited, than putting it on every single cut.
Also mostly I found some issues with motion and need all cuts in the sequence of specific media move a few pixel out.

Okay, so here's an idea that I just realized should be way more obvious than it seems to be:

Premiere should just have everything that all the other programs in the CC suite have.

I was putting together a sound design for a short film over the past few days, and I had to get rid of some noise in the dialogue tracks. I tried using the Adaptive Noise Reducer in Premiere, and... well, it sucks. The adaptive nature of it causes noise to randomly flare up at the beginning of each clip, or right after any abrupt sounds in the audio, etc... it's just about useless most of the time.
So I searched online for where I can get the best noise reduction tools, and one of the suggestions for the best noise reduction programs was Audition. I'd never used Audition before, because I assumed it was mostly aimed at music producers, and any tools I might need from it were probably in Premiere anyway, since it's all Adobe, and if they're gonna have noise reduction in both programs, why wouldn't it just be the same?

But lo and behold, I tried the noise reduction in Audition and holy ****! It's amazing. Noise was gone and the remaining audio sounded great. It's miles ahead of the noise reduction filters in Premiere.

So... WHY THE HECK DOESN'T PREMIERE JUST HAVE THAT SAME FILTER???

And once I asked myself that question, it suddenly opened the floodgates. Why doesn't Premiere just have everything?

I understand that Audition and After Effects and Photoshop, etc, are all necessary programs for many people who don't need everything all in one. Visual effects artists only need what After Effects offers. Photographers only need what Photoshop or Lightroom offers. Music producers only need what Audition offers, and so on. So I'm not asking you to merge everything into one program and get rid of all the others.

But filmmakers need everything that all these programs have. It's the reason we buy the whole Creative Suite and not just Premiere. But man... it would sure be amazing if we only needed Premiere because Premiere had everything.

So I'm asking you to make Premiere the special program. The amalgam of everything that the Creative Suite offers all in one program for those who need everything and want it all in one convenient place without having to switch programs for special purposes all the time. Like if I need to do a greenscreen chroma key, I can't just do it in Premiere because the keying filters in Premiere suck. I have to go to After Effects to do all my keying. And as I explained, I'm now going to have to switch over to Audition anytime I want to do decent noise reduction.

Just put it all in Premiere, please! I've seen the odd comment on here that has suggested merging Premiere and After Effects, but like I said, I understand that there are many people who need After Effects to remain it's own program. So I don't think just merging Premiere and After Effects into one program and getting rid of them is the right thing to do. But if you JUST give Premiere everything the other programs have, then those of us who want everything can have it in one program, while those who just want the specialized programs can also have them.

I mean... I never really understood the practice of making different filters that do the same thing in two different programs that are both included in the same package suite... like, why give Premiere and After Effects different keying filters, and have the only real difference be that Premiere's filters just suck by comparison? Why not just put Keylight in Premiere as well, instead of wasting resources coding and maintaining a whole different set of filters in Premiere that aren't as good anyway? It doesn't make sense to me. I would think that it was capitalism-motivated, a ploy to make us buy After Effects as well instead of just buying Premiere... but that can't be the case, because both programs just come included in the CC suite.

It's all confusing and frustrating to me. It lets me know that whoever's running the show at Adobe really isn't thinking very well about all of this. I really don't know what needs to happen at Adobe to get things to where they really ought to be, but please please please figure it out and improve the streamlining of usability for these products. I really really would like to stick with Premiere, but when I see companies like Blackmagic putting out Davinci Resolve, which is not just an editing program, but also an advanced color correction program, a visual effects program, an audio editing program... ALL IN ONE!... it really does make me yearn for that kind of ingenuity to spread to Adobe. I've strongly considered switching to Resolve, especially once my production company gets a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema 4k camera, and Premiere still doesn't have Blackmagic RAW support...

Then I go and look at the early peeks and reviews of Premiere 2019, and... sigh... it's looking like nothing more than a minor upgrade with a few rather unexciting features added... Please don't tell me I have to wait a whole other year until 2020 releases to see the kind of upgrades the program desperately needs. And DEFINITELY don't tell me it won't even be there then. Otherwise, I'm convincing my boss that we need to switch our company to another editing program.

Regardless of what the answer is, please respond. Let us know what's going on. What is the plan? You haven't even responded on the Blackmagic RAW thread yet as to whether that's coming or not, and it's a thread that's been piling up for weeks now, desperately asking you guys to give us an answer.

Give us an answer. Soon.

I think the sequence markers need radically overhauling. Below are three different suggestions that I think will help. I've also attached an image of how these changes will look:

Problem 1: Currently, when you use "track select forward" it ONLY selects clips and not the sequence markers. This makes the tool virtually useless, as it means your markers no longer remain in place!

Solution: "Track select forward" tool should select clips AND markers.

Problem 2: The sequence markers exist as individual objects, so to change the division of two sections requires resizing BOTH sections. Sections can also overlap, which is highly undesirable.

Solution: Sequence markers should not exist as individual objects, they should just be divisions of the overall span. So when you drag to resize, it changes the BOUNDARY between two sections.

Problem 3: Like most people, I just want to use markers to divide my video into sections (eg "Intro", "Part 1", "Conclusion" etc). This is currently extremely cumbersome. To create a section, you have to right click on the bar, then go into the settings, adjust the duration to something other than zero, then come back and and resize, etc.

Solution: To create a section, simply click once on the markers area and type a section name. Presto! A section has now been created, automatically giving it a color. (Unnamed sections remain uncolored.) In order to create new sections, you just use the razor blade tool to divide it into more sections.

I believe all these suggestions will make a big improvement to Premiere Pro, which doesn't currently seem to offer serious support for labeling the various sections of your video. However, with a long and complicated video project, it is imperative to have a clear breakdown of the video's overall structure

The current way to add and manipulate transitions on the timeline is a sort of "guess & check" method, you've got to have the right amount of handle frames before you add it, and the way it is displayed isn't very visually appealing.

I propose adding the same functionality that Audition has, where overlapping clips will automatically create a crossfade. This is an incredibly intuitive way of handling transitions, and can also be applied to Video transitions (as is done on other professional NLEs). See attached gif for an explanation of what I mean.

Currently, overlapping clips on the timeline will create a cut. For editors that use this functionality as a shortcut (no pun intended), this "auto crossfade" feature would be optional (easy to toggle on/off on-the-fly).

I think this would be a great way to increase productivity for transitions, as well as avoid accidentally losing your work by inadvertently overlapping clips when moving things around en masse on the timeline!